Tips for Writing Effective Email
April 15, 2008 8:50 am | Author: Stephen McMillin | Filed Under Email-Faculty and Staff, Email-Student |Writing Effective E-Mail: Top 10 Tips
This document offers 10 tips to help you write effective professional e-mails. The informal notes you exchange with your friends don’t have to meet any particular standards, of course, but if you want to be taken seriously by professionals, you should know formal e-mail etiquette.
|
12 Dec 2000; by Jessica Bauer (UWEC student) and Dennis G. Jerz 1. Write a meaningful subject line. Recipients scan the subject line in order to decide whether to open, forward, file, or trash a message. Remember — your message is not the only one in your recipient’s mailbox.
My e-mail accounts get dozens of virus-bearing junk mails each day, often bearing a vague title such as “That file you requested,” or no title at all. You’ll get a faster response if your recipient can tell from the subject line that it’s a real message from a real person. 2. Keep the message focused and readable. Often recipients only read partway through a long message, hit “reply” as soon as they have something to contribute, and forget to keep reading. This is part of human nature. If your e-mail contains multiple messages that are only loosely related, in order to avoid the risk that your reader will reply only to the first item that grabs his or her fancy, you could number your points to ensure they are all read (adding an introductory line that states how many parts there are to the message). If the points are substantial enough, split them up into separate messages so your recipient can delete, respond, file, or forward each item individually. Keep your message readable.
3. Avoid attachments. Put your information the the body of your e-mail whenever possible. Attachments
Instead of sending a whole word processor file, just copy and paste the relevant text into the e-mail (unless of course your recipient actually needs to view file in order to edit or archive it). [I’m annoyed when people send bulk e-mails with attached pdf or Word documents that contain nothing more than a few paragraphs of ordinary text. I’d much rather get a plain text message, with a link to where I can download the full version if I want to enjoy all the colors and typefaces. Sending a 1MB attachment to hundreds or thousands of employees is a huge waste of digital resources. — DGJ] 4. Identify yourself clearly. When contacting someone cold, always include your name, occupation, and any other important identification information in the first few sentences. If you are following up on a face-to-face contact, you might appear too timid if you assume your recipient doesn’t remember you; but you can drop casual hints to jog their memory: “I enjoyed talking with you about PDAs in the elevator the other day.” 5. Be kind. Don’t flame. To “flame” someone is to write an abusive personal attack. If you find yourself writing in anger, take a break. Take some time to cool off before you hit “send.” Don’t “flame” without weighing the consequences.
6. Proofread. If you are asking someone else to do work for you, take the time to make your message look professional. While your spell checker won’t catch every mistake, at the very least it will catch a few typos. If you are sending a message that will be read by someone higher up on the chain of command (a superior or professor, for instance), or if you’re about to mass-mail dozens or thousands of people, take an extra minute or two before you hit “send”. Show a draft to a close associate, in order to see whether it actually makes sense. 7. Don’t assume privacy. Unless you are Donald Trump, praise in public, and criticize in private. Don’t send anything over e-mail that you wouldn’t want posted — with your name attached — in the break room. E-mail is not secure. Just as random pedestrians could easily reach into your mailbox and intercept the envelopes that you send and receive through the post office, a curious hacker, a malicious criminal, or the FBI can easily intercept your e-mail. In some companies, the e-mail administrator has the ability to read any and all e-mail messages (and may fire you if you write anything inappropriate). 8. Distinguish between formal and informal situations. When you are writing to a friend or a close colleague, it is OK to use “smilies” 9. Respond Promptly. If you want to appear professional and courteous, make yourself available to your online correspondents. Even if your reply is, “Sorry, I’m too busy to help you now,” at least your correspondent won’t be waiting in vain for your reply. 10. Show Respect and Restraint Many a flame war has been started by someone who hit “reply all” instead of “reply.” While most people know that e-mail is not private, it is good form to ask the sender before forwarding a personal message. If someone e-mails you a request, it is perfectly acceptable to forward the request to a person who can help — but forwarding a message in order to ridicule the sender is tacky. Use BCC instead of CC when sending sensitive information to large groups. (For example, a professor sending a bulk message to students who are in danger of failing, or an employer telling unsuccessful applicants that a position is no longer open.) The name of everyone in the CC list goes out with the message, but the names of people on the BCC list (”blind carbon copy”) are hidden. Put your own name in the “To” box if your mail editor doesn’t like the blank space. Be tolerant of other people’s etiquette blunders. If you think you’ve been insulted, quote the line back to your sender and add a neutral comment such as, “I’m not sure how to interpret this… could you elaborate?” Sometimes E-Mail is Too Fast! A colleague once asked me for help, and then almost immediately sent a follow-up informing me she had solved the problem on her own. But before reading her second message, I replied at length to the first. Once I learned that there was no need for any reply, I worried that my response would seem pompous, so I followed up with a quick apology: “Should have paid closer attention to my e-mail.” What I meant to say was “[I] should have looked more carefully at my [list of incoming] e-mail [before replying],” but I could tell from my colleague’s terse reply that she had interpreted it as if I was criticizing her. If I hadn’t responded so quickly to the first message, I would have saved myself the time I spent writing a long answer to an obsolete question. If I hadn’t responded so quickly to the second message, I might not have alienated the person I had been so eager to help. |